Determination of Geoid Height from the XGM2019e_2159 Global Geopotential Model and the ETOPO1 Digital Elevation Model

Authors

1 0983008248

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21107766

Keywords:

Geoid height, XGM2019e_2159, ICGEM, ETOPO1, accuracy evaluation
Received 2026-06-03
Published 2026-06-30

Abstract

Geoid height is a fundamental quantity in geodesy, providing the link between ellipsoidal and physical heights and supporting applications such as the realization of national height systems, GNSS–levelling data processing, and studies of the Earth’s gravity field. Recent high-resolution global gravity field models enable increasingly accurate geoid determination directly from spherical harmonic coefficients. This study investigates the theoretical framework for computing geoid height from spherical harmonic coefficients in combination with topographic information and develops a computational program for this purpose. Numerical experiments were conducted using the global gravity field model XGM2019e_2159 and the topographic model ETOPO1. The developed program was validated through comparison with results provided by ICGEM at 13,041 points covering the entire territory of Vietnam. The comparison indicates that the geoid height on the ellipsoid surface shows a mean difference of 0.01 cm with a standard deviation of 0.02 cm, while the terrain heights interpolated from ETOPO1 are fully consistent. Differences in geoid height at the topographic surface have a mean value of −0.14 cm with a standard deviation of ±1.97 cm, mainly caused by differences in the treatment of topographic effects between the two approaches. These results demonstrate the reliability of the developed program and highlight its potential for applications in high-precision geodetic studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ủy ban Thường vụ Quốc hội. (2025). Nghị quyết số 1656/NQ-UBTVQH15 ngày 16/6/2025 về việc sắp xếp các đơn vị hành chính cấp xã của thành phố Hà Nội năm 2025.

[2] Chính phủ. (2025). Nghị định số 151/2025/NĐ-CP ngày 12/6/2025 quy định về phân định thẩm quyền của chính quyền địa phương 02 cấp, phân quyền, phân cấp trong lĩnh vực đất đai.

[3] Duan, J., Tian, G., Yang, L., & Zhou, T. (2021). Addressing the macroeconomic and hedonic determinants of housing prices in Beijing Metropolitan Area, China. Habitat International, 113, 102374. doi: https://doi.org10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102374

[4] Luo, H., Zhao, S., & Yao, R. (2021). Determinants of Housing Prices in Dalian City, China: Empirical Study Based on Hedonic Price Model. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(2). doi: https://doi.org10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000698

[5] Soltani, A., Zali, N., Aghajani, H., Hashemzadeh, F., Rahimi, A., & Heydari, M. (2024). The nexus between transportation infrastructure and housing prices in metropolitan regions. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39, 787-812. doi: https://doi.org10.1007/s10901-023-10085-3

[6] Phan Thị Thanh Huyền, Lo Thi Hong, & Ho Thi Lam Tra. (2017). Factors Affecting Residential Land Price in Dien Bien Phu City, Dien Bien Province. Tạp chí Khoa học Nông nghiệp Việt Nam, 15(9), 1186-1195. doi: https://doi.org/10.31817/tckhnnvn.2017.15.9.

[7] Nguyễn Văn Bình, Hồ Nhật Linh, & Trần Thị Ánh Tuyết. (2020). Factors Affecting Real Estate Price in Hue City, Thua Thien Hue Province. Hue University Journal of Science: Agriculture and Rural Development, 129(3). https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijard.v129i3C.5986

[8] Doãn Quang Cường, & Trần Quốc Bình. (2020). Application of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Valuation of Urban Residential Land in Quoc Oai Town, Quoc Oai District, Hanoi City. VNU Journal of Science: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1094/vnuees.4521

[9] Lê Phương Thúy, Bùi Ngọc Tú, Phạm Lê Tuấn, & Trần Quốc Bình. (2020). Effects of Urban Transportation Infrastructure Development Projects on Residential Land Price in Cau Giay District, Hanoi City. VNU Journal of Science: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1094/vnuees.4522

[10] Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55. https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/Likert_1932.pdf

[11] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_Multivariate%20Data%20Analysis_Hair.pdf

[12] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. http://cda.psych.uiuc.edu/psychometrika_highly_cited_articles/cronbach_1951.pdf

[13] Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

https://www.cbpbu.ac.in/userfiles/file/2020/STUDY_MAT/ECO/1.pdf

[14] Nathans, L. L., Oswald, F. L., & Nimon, K. (2012). Interpreting multiple linear regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(9), 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674063297.c1

[15] Quốc hội. (2023). Luật Nhà ở số 27/2023/QH15.

[16] Quốc hội. (2023). Luật Kinh doanh bất động sản số 29/2023/QH15.

[17] Quốc hội. (2024). Luật Đất đai số 31/2024/QH15.

[18] Nguyễn Lâm Quỳnh Trâm, & Nguyễn Xuân Long. (2025). Đánh giá tác động của tuyến Metro số 1 đến giá bất động sản tại TP.HCM: Ứng dụng mô hình Hedonic kết hợp GIS. Tạp chí Vật liệu và Xây dựng - Bộ Xây dựng, 15(06), 197-205. https://ojs.jomc.vn/index.php/vn/article/view/1131

[19] Malaitham, S., Fukuda, A., Vichiensan, V., & Wasuntarasook, V. (2020). Hedonic pricing model of assessed and market land values: A case study in Bangkok metropolitan area, Thailand. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(1), 153-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.09.008

[20] Yin, Z., Li, W., Li, C., & Zheng, Y. (2025). The relationship between accessibility and land prices: A focus on accessibility to transit in the 15-min city. Travel Behaviour and Society, 38, Article 100914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100914

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
“Determination of Geoid Height from the XGM2019e_2159 Global Geopotential Model and the ETOPO1 Digital Elevation Model”, GCGIS, vol. 12, no. 03, pp. 47–58, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.21107766.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

21-30 of 59

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.